adblock_left.gif (1110 bytes)

side_left.gif (185 bytes)
 

 

Roger Kanno

As I walked through the hallways of the Venetian on the final day of the show, I was drawn to the TAD room, as often happens. TAD always puts on a great demo, and Andrew Jones, TAD’s director of engineering, is an engaging fellow. This year he had a stereo-only demo of some excellent material played back from a music server, including both high-resolution and standard 16-bit material. He also played back a track from a Tape Project open-reel tape of a Keith Johnson recording from Reference Recordings. It was spectacular.

Andrew also explained that TAD has now become an entirely separate division of Pioneer and is officially known as Technical Audio Devices Laboratories. He also went on to explain that the company is now "serious" about making inroads into the audiophile market, even though TAD has its roots in the pro market. To that end, he showed a compact version of the TAD Reference speaker and a prototype power amplifier. Usually when a speaker manufacturer decides to build electronics, it sends off warning bells in my head. But if any company could do it, it would be one like TAD.

Companies like TAD (with Pioneer’s backing), JBL with the Project Everest DD66000 speaker system, and KEF’s Muon are a few examples of what large speaker manufacturers can accomplish with their state-of-the-art design and manufacturing facilities. They also have to have talented engineers who understand speaker design and are passionate about music reproduction. When you speak with these engineers (or sometimes teams of engineers), you not only get a sense of their technical knowledge (which is way beyond mine), but also their passion for music. That impresses me.

*     *      *

Something that I noticed at this year’s CES is that both mass-market products and even some high-end ones are more commonly employing Digital Signal Processing (DSP) for room correction. The most recognizable brand of room correction is by Audyssey and can be found in products as diverse as receivers from Onkyo, Denon and NAD to speaker systems from Wisdom Audio and Phase Technology. Several of our reviewers, including Wes Marshall, Doug Blackburn and Vince Hanada, use Audyssey digital room correction in their systems and swear by it.

One thing that surprised me was Sherwood’s use of room correction from Trinnov, a company that I had not heard of. They manufacture a $13,000 pro-based system, but Sherwood has incorporated "Trinnov Optimizer" room correction into the $1800 R-975 receiver (shown above). Trinnov claims that their system measures the audio signal in three dimensions and processes it so that the resulting soundfield conforms to the ITU 5.1-channel speaker layout.

I have heard demos of digital room correction in the past from TacT, Lyngdorf Audio, Behold and others. They have impressed me, but nothing like what I heard today from Anthem. The D2 audio/video processor with ARC-1 (Anthem Room Correction) and Paradigm Reference Signature speakers sounded incredible. I can’t get Shakira out of my mind.

*     *      *

I must admit that I was a little disappointed walking the show floor at the Las Vegas Convention Center today. I was looking for new TVs and although there were a few interesting developments, there was nothing groundbreaking.

Super-thin panels are in, and several manufacturers, including Pioneer and Sharp, were showing prototypes that were less than an inch deep. In fact, Pioneer’s plasma was only 9mm thick. That is slightly less than half an inch. Impressive as that may be, unless the picture quality is also improved, thinness doesn’t particularly interest me. However, Pioneer’s Extreme contrast technology is promising. The current Kuro line of plasmas already has excellent black levels, but Extreme contrast might make them as good or better than even the best CRTs ever were.

OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) technology also shows potential, and Sony had a display with many different panels of varying sizes. The images were certainly eye-catching. Sony even had a 30" prototype with 1080p resolution, but widespread use of OLED technology is years away. Sony reportedly has an 11" model now available, but it costs $2500.

Samsung had a 3840 x 2160 LCD that they touted as the world’s largest "Ultra High Definition" LCD. Even more impressive was Panasonic’s 150" plasma also with 4k resolution. I couldn’t help but wonder if these products would ever make it to market. At least Panasonic’s current 103" 1080p plasma is a real product that you can order from your Panasonic dealer -- if you have $70,000, that is.

*     *      *

A few months ago, I thought that the high-def format war was all but over. Blu-ray seemed to have the overwhelming edge in both hardware and software sales. Then something happened. Paramount and Dreamworks announced that they were going HD DVD, which meant that the number of new movie releases would then be split roughly equally between the two formats. The race was on. Well, fast forward to last Friday, when Warner, which had up until then been format neutral, releasing in both HD DVD and Blu-ray, announced that they were going Blu-ray exclusively.

Many people now think that the format war is effectively over, again, and that Blu-ray will prevail. Judging by the elaborate displays, festive mood and crowds at the Blu-ray Disc Association booth, compared to the funeral atmosphere and subdued displays at the HD DVD Promotion Group’s booth, Doug Schneider thinks so too. But I’m not so sure. A lot of people have purchased HD DVD players with the recent price drops and manufacturer-backed sales promotions, and the Xbox 360 game console has outsold Sony’s Blu-ray equipped PS3 by a wide margin (although it is unclear just how many of those Xboxes have the optional HD DVD drive).

Maybe I’m just cynical after the whole SACD/DVD-Audio format war that never was, but I remember speaking to the head designer of a major speaker manufacturer about ten years ago and lamenting the confusion over the new digital audio formats, Dolby Digital and DTS. He confided in me then that he couldn’t understand why the consumer electronics industry kept shooting itself in the foot and making things more difficult for both the consumer and themselves. Well, they’ve done it again. Blu-ray may eventually become the dominant and only surviving high-def video format, but it will not replace standard-def DVD -- that is, unless the manufacturers and studios fully support a single high-def format and phase out DVD. That means that all of the future players would have to support the high-def format and there would be a single hybrid, high-def disc that would still be playable on legacy DVD players. The new hardware and software would have to be no more expensive than current DVD-based products. That probably will not happen, although I will be pleasantly surprised if it does.

 

side_right.gif (184 bytes)
 

All contents copyright © Schneider Publishing Inc.
Reproduction without permission is prohibited.

SoundStage! Network